LJ Jackson commissioned to lead the government review on fixed recoverable costs

Lord Justice Jackson is to lead a new review of fixed recoverable costs, HM Judiciary announced last week. Commissioned by the Lord Chief Justice and Master of the Rolls, the review will take forward the government’s commitment to a new costs regime,  outlined in September’s Transforming our Justice System consultation paper.

Lord Justice Jackson, whose last costs reform proposals were largely adopted in April 2013, will formally begin the review in January but will ask for submissions immediately. It is understood the process should be completed by 31 July 2017. Written evidence or submissions to assist the review must be received by Monday 16 January 2017, and be sent to: fixed.costs@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk.

Unsurprisingly, the announcement has not been met with universal approval. Some members of the legal profession have questioned his appointment, as it is well-known that LJ Jackson has long been a prominent advocate of a blanket extension of fixed recoverable costs, and has openly argued for a fixed costs regime to apply to all civil claims worth up to £250,000. However, LJ Jackson has tried to calm fears, and has stressed that any reforms will only be introduced after a lengthy and inclusive consultation period:

‘Although the momentum is heavily for reform, the review will provide ample opportunity for comments and submissions on the form and scope that reform should take,’ he said.

‘I am inviting the views of practitioners, users of the civil courts and any other interested parties on these points. Seminars will be held in London and elsewhere to discuss the issues. There is a great deal to be done on the detail of the review, which will inform the government as it prepares proposals for formal consultation in due course,’ he added.

So what is the scope of the review? Well, the terms of reference state that proposals will ensure the costs of going to court are ‘more certain, transparent and proportionate for litigants’. It will also consider the types and areas of litigation in which such costs should be extended, and the value of claims to which such a regime should apply.

The announcement was welcomed by FOIL, the Forum of Insurance Lawyers. Nigel Teasdale, president of FOIL, said:

‘FOIL welcomes long-anticipated progress in the widening of fixed costs – with the launch of the review a first important step towards a positive outcome for the industry. It is very encouraging to see the determination for an extension, not only for clinical negligence and personal injury claims, but across the civil justice system, and Lord Justice Jackson is absolutely the best-placed person to lead this review.’

However, the Law Society did not seem to be quite so enthusiastic, giving the announcement a more muted and cautious response. Law Society president, Robert Bourns, said:

‘We had a strong indication earlier in the year that ministers were looking to expand the areas of civil litigation where fixed recoverable costs apply – this was referred to in the Transforming Our Justice System proposals unveiled in September.’

‘We do not oppose the principle of fixed costs for straightforward, low value claims as they can provide some certainty for both sides in litigation and avoid protracted disputes about the level of costs.’

‘But we have previously expressed concern at suggestions that costs should be fixed for all claims up to £250,000 – a tenfold increase on the current limit for many claims subject to a fixed cost regime. Cases at this level of compensation include situations where people have been very seriously harmed and where the application of fixed costs would be totally inappropriate. It would also raise significant questions about people’s ability to access justice.’

‘Such a one size fits all approach for all cases, regardless of complexity, will simply make many cases economically unviable, undermining the principle of justice delivering fairness for all.’

Jackson has invited

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>