Find Out More

  • Accreditations
  • Join our Team
  • Terms of Business
  • Pricing Information
  • Client Feedback
    • Leave a Review
  • Complaints
  • Regulatory Information
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Skip to footer navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation

Harold Stock & Co. Solicitors

Rooted in the community

  • Mossley:
    01457 835597
  • Failsworth:
    0161 682 2400
  • Stockport:
    0161 456 5012
  • Get In Touch
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Team
    • CSR
  • Legal Services
    • Personal Injury
    • Medical Negligence
    • Serious Injury
    • Commercial and Company
    • Property
    • Wills, Probate And The Elderly
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • More

Overtime Should Count In Holiday Pay Rules Employment Appeal Tribunal.

7th November 2014 by Harold Stock & Co

Under the current UK interpretation of the EU-wide Working Time Directive, in particular the Working Time Regulations implemented in the UK in 1998, only basic pay counts in the calculation of holiday pay.

However, this interpretation may have to change following a ground-breaking ruling at the Employment Appeal Tribunal. Ruling on 3 separate cases brought by workers, the tribunal decided that the Working Time Directive had been incorrectly applied, and overtime should have in fact been included when calculating holiday pay.

This means some people working overtime could claim for additional holiday pay.

The tribunal also ruled that workers can make backdated claims, but only for a limited period. However, it should be noted that the ruling could yet be referred to the Court of Appeal, which means that a final declaratory judgement on the matter may yet be years away.

The tribunal ruled on three cases – road maintenance company Bear Scotland v Fulton, engineering firm Amec v Law and industrial services group Hertel v Wood. The employees won their original claims and the tribunal has now rejected the companies’ appeals.

Why is this ruling so important? Well, simply because of the number of workers who could potentially make a future claim against their employer. According to the official ONS breakdown, of the 30 million working adults in the UK, 5 million people do compulsory or voluntary overtime. Of those, 23% of men working full-time and 15% of men working part-time do overtime: whilst 12% of full-time working women and 15% of part-time working women do overtime.

The legal profession is in broad agreement that the tribunal’s ruling has widespread implications for companies where staff are required to do overtime as a regular part of their job, that is compulsory overtime. However, many lawyers are still uncertain whether the tribunal’s ruling applies to workers doing voluntary overtime.

The Trade Unions, however, were understandably happy with the tribunal’s ruling, with Howard Beckett of the Unite Union telling the BBC:

“Up until now, some workers who are required to do overtime have been penalised for taking the time off that they are entitled to. This ruling not only secures justice for our members who were short changed, but means employers have got to get their house in order.”

The reactions from government and businesses were somewhat less enthusiastic. The coalition government and business groups had argued strongly that overtime should not be included in holiday pay calculations. They were particularly concerned about a raft of back payments potentially going back many years. However, backdated claims have been limited, with the tribunal ruling that employees cannot claim more than three months after the last incorrect payment.

Speaking after the ruling, Business Secretary Vince Cable said he would be setting up a task force to assess the impact of the ruling:

“Government will review the judgment in detail as a matter of urgency,” he said.

“To properly understand the financial exposure employers face, we have set up a task force of representatives from government and business to discuss how we can limit the impact on business.”

Speaking on behalf of business, John Cridland, the CBI director general, however, was forthright in his criticism:

“This is a real blow to UK businesses now facing the prospect of punitive costs potentially running into billions of pounds – and not all will survive, which could mean significant job losses.”

“This judgment must be challenged. We need the UK government to step up its defence of the current UK law, and use its powers to limit any retrospective liability that firms may face,” he added.

It seems likely, given the huge financial implications of the ruling, that employers will lodge an appeal. According to Jean Lovett, employment and incentives partner at the law firm Linklaters:

“The potential financial implications for many employers will be significant. We envisage that the tribunal’s decision will not be the last word on this issue. As significant sums are involved, we expect the decision to be appealed.”

“Due to the costs involved many employers may now look to reduce the availability of overtime, where feasible.”

Filed Under: Employment Tagged With: Employment Appeal Tribunal, working time directive

Harold Stock & Co

Related

Holiday Pay: Could your business be at risk?
10th July 2019
Categories: Employment, News
4 Out Of Every 5 Claimants Are Deterred From Pursuing Employment Tribunal Claims Because Of Fees Claims Citizens Advice Poll.
14th January 2015
Tags: employment, employment tribunal
Categories: Employment
Social Media And The Workplace.
27th May 2014
Tags: social media, social network
Categories: Employment, Employment Law

Footer

  • Accreditations
  • Join our Team
  • Terms of Business
  • Pricing Information
  • Client Feedback
    • Leave a Review
  • Complaints
  • Regulatory Information
  • Acceptable Use
  • Complaints
  • Email Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy/Cookies
  • Regulatory Information
  • Terms of Website Use
harold stock solicitors

Mossley (Head Office)

55-57 Stamford Street
Mossley
Tameside OL5 0LN

Tel: 01457 835597
Fax: 0330 024 9210

harold stock solicitors

Failsworth

Ivy Business Centre
Crown Street
Failsworth M35 9PB

Tel: 0161 682 2400
Fax: 0330 024 9210

harold stock solicitors

Stockport

Pepper House
1 Pepper Road
Stockport SK7 5DP

Tel: 0161 456 5012
Fax: 0330 024 9210

Email: info@haroldstock.com

Harold Stock & Co Solicitors is a trading name of Harold Stock & Co Limited, a Limited Company registered in England and Wales. Company No: 07201476. Registered Office: 55-57 Stamford Street, Mossley, Tameside, OL5 0LN. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (535629). VAT No: 991 015 916 A full list of Directors is available at the Company’s Registered Office.

  • Acceptable Use
  • Complaints
  • Email Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy/Cookies
  • Regulatory Information
  • Terms of Website Use

Company Registered in England and Wales. No. 07201476
Copyright © 2023
Log in
Instilled Ltd

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT